My First Market Crash

March 1st, 2010

Every decade or so there is some investment… high tech stocks, gold, junk bonds, houses, tulip bulbs, you name it, which just cannot go down in value because this is a “New Era.” Then that market crashes.

The first time I observed this phenomenon, I was 16 years old and working for a coin store in a small town in South Georgia, around 1964, when Hillary was a Goldwater Girl. The coin store was called Coins and Components because the owners, two air force pilots, were diversifying their portfolio with stereo components. This was before the internet, although there was an internet of sorts…DARPANET, which only a few pointy-headed pseudo-intellectuals in Washington knew about anyhow. The computers that existed were in rather large buildings, and it was yet a few years before I would know what an “infinite loop” is.

The coin dealers were linked by a nationwide network of teletype machines. If Al Gore were still alive, he would see differences in the technology used. He might scream at the dead trees on the floor and the electricity consumption (which was thought at the time to be just a few short years from “too cheap to meter,” but that is a story for another day). He would find no differences at all in the network concept of the coin dealer internet. Of course, I’m just joking with the political references, so your reading won’t become monotonous.

My job at the coin store was to search through bags of coins from local banks and take any out that were worth more than face value. There had been a surge in the price of silver. Silver nickels, produced during WWII, were being sold in bulk then melted down for their silver content. There were other coins of numismatic value in general circulation at the time. As I recall, the mint took the silver out of other coins at the time, but their silver content had not yet exceeded the value of the coin. So it was not yet profitable to melt down anything other than war nickels. I was paid 50 cents per hour when I began and maybe slightly more when the job ended.

I was a kid collector. The hobby began to take on the face of an investment, drawing me into that aspect of the market. I was lucky I did not have much money to spend, although I did not think so at the time. I found most of the coins for my own collection by looking through rolls of coins I bought at the bank. In those years in that town, it was safe for me to walk or ride my bike to a bank and buy $25-$50 in rolls of coins. I rarely collected high denomination coins, fifty cent pieces, silver dollars, even quarters, because just saving them put a dent in my wallet. So I was somewhat resentful when I wanted to purchase a coin, but happy when the ones I found went up in value. You all know how that works I’m sure.

The importance of stereo component sales diminished as coin sales rose. Suddenly the teletype spit out constant reams of paper and the shop was filled with customers on weekends. Silver dollar prices streaked towards the roof. The US Mint churned out proof sets, mint sets, rolls of coins and sold bags of uncirculated Carson City silver dollars that it discovered in a vault into the face of rising prices and heavy demand. Private mints began producing collectibles that looked like coins, but of course were not legal tender. A roll of uncirculated new pennies sold for $1 through dealers. They were 50 cents at the bank and Uncle Sam was churning out 100’s of millions. Higher denominations also sold at a premium. The belief was that they would be worth more the next year… just like houses in 2007, tulips in Holland centuries ago, stock in the 1920’s. The objects change, but the psychology never does.

One week the prices started crashing. I believe it began with a particularly collectable silver dollar from the New Orleans mint. The teletype machines screamed out in panic as prices of almost all collectible coins dropped all week. As I remember, the value of that silver dollar dropped from $400 to $40. I could be wrong on the exact details and I am not going to spend time researching it for this blog post. But the drop was significant.

It was soon all over but the crying. Not long afterwards my job ended, the store closed. But it has had a profound impact on how I view markets.

HEK

http://econpolicy.com

Smart Meter vs Intelligent Thermostat

February 13th, 2010

I think it is pretty well taken for granted that electricity is cheaper to produce during the night. The differential might not be so great in thhe winter, but it’s probably still there.

We are told to turn down our thermostats at night in the winter. The chill is more bearable when one is asleep. The gas and furnace run on electricity as does a heat pump. So what happens when you have an intelligent thermostat that automatically adjusts the temperature to cooler at night, and a smart meter telling you to run the electricity because it’s cheaper at night? And just the opposite during the day. Do the two devices fight it out while you go about your business?

HEK

http://econpolicy.com

Event: On the Road to $200 Oil?

January 26th, 2010

At the New America Foundation tomorrow: http://www.newamerica.net/events/2010/driving_oil_policy.  Appears to be an interesting discussion, accompanied by the official think tank box lunch.  Sandwich, chips, apple and cookie usually.  Sometimes a pasta salad instead of the chips.

Are there policy events in Washington, DC that you would like to attend, but cannot?  I will go in your place,  provide you a written report and summary, and a 30 minute phone conversation to discuss the event and the policy implications for  your particular interest.  All for a flat rate fee.  This does not include any registration fees, but most policy seminars such as this one are free.

HEK

New Policy Organization: CSCEM

January 4th, 2010

My good friend Ken Malloy has started another policy organization, the Center for the  Study of Carbon and Energy Markets (http://www.energymarkets.org).  I am probably not as idealistic as Ken, who states,  “In order to preserve credibility and independence, the Center does not accept contributions from government sources, or from energy or environmental companies, law firms or consulting firms that represent them, nor trade associations.  We seek funding from foundations that support research and educational programs concerning free markets and democratic processes and principles, and by tax deductible contributions from private citizens.”

I am not the free market purist he is either, and I have never been a Reaganite, as he describes himself.  However,  I do believe in markets if competition can lead to innovation and efficiency, and there are effective and enforced rules of the game established by government and/or private organizations.  Most of all, I appreciate his stand against  “energy independence,” which anyone who really understands energy markets, knows is nonsense.  Humans trade.  We have done so for millennia and will continue to do so.  While it is prudent to stockpile oil for security purposes, as we do in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, pretending we can produce all the energy we need in the USA if only we follow policies A, B and C (which vary according to the ideology or interest of the speaker),  merely distracts us from obtaining and using resources wisely.

May your endeavors bear fruit, Ken.  And have fun along the way.

HEK

Politics in the Regulatory Process? I’m Shocked!

December 31st, 2009

Catching up on my reading:

In “Limited Utility”  (http://www.american.com/archive/2009/november/limited-utility),  Roger Noriega discovers politics entering into the regulatory process in Florida.  Hard to imagine, isn’t it?

I have no idea what the merits are in this particular case.  But just ask former (recalled) governor Gray Davis of California about whether regulatory commissions can have anything to do with a politician’s future.

HEK

Click here to visit Powell's Books!

FERC Discovers Section 5 of the Natural Gas Act

December 16th, 2009

Despite rumors of its disappearance,  the FERC discovered that Section 5  is still part of the Natural Gas Act (http://www.ferc.gov/news/news-releases/2009/2009-4/11-19-09-G-3.asp).   Many believed that The Market had replaced Section 5, but apparently this is not the case.

I am not willing to leap to conclusions about what the actual rates should be in these three particular cases, other than that they should be just.  And reasonable too.  The pipelines have not yet filed their cases.  New shale gas discoveries, particularly the Marcellus field, have the potential to change gas supply and transportation patterns.  Gas  is being touted as a “transition fuel” in the movement towards a greener future.  So it is fitting to look at pipeline rates as part of an overall assessment of the natural gas supply chain.

I still have some expertise in pipeline rates and rate design.  My dance card is not yet filled.  Call or email me if there is something I can do for you.

HEK

Updated EIA Energy Forecast to 2035 Presentation

December 1st, 2009

GEEI Announcement.  See their website for further information.

HEK

Global Energy and Environment Initiative (GEEI) presents EIA’s Updated Energy Forecasts to 2035
WHO: Richard G. Newell, Administrator, Energy Information Agency (EIA), U.S. Department of Energy
WHEN: 9:30 AM Eastern Time
Monday, December 14, 2009
WHERE: The Kenney Auditorium, SAIS Main Building, 1st Floor
1740 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington D.C., 20036
RSVP: geei@jhu.edu
For information please visit the GEEI website: www.geei-sais.org.

Energy and Climate Event, Nov. 24

November 19th, 2009

An event at the National Academy of Sciences FYI.

HEK

http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/events/innovations.html

Time for Change: Reframing the Conversation on Energy and Climate

A discussion on the occasion of the release of the Innovations journal special issue on energy & climate

Event Details
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Time: 1:00 – 6:45PM (Event: 1-5:40PM; Reception: 5:45-6:45PM)
Place: The National Academy of Sciences, 21st and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC

Event Description
The goal of this meeting is to contribute to reframing the conversation on energy and climate by illuminating opportunities inherent in the transition away from carbon intensity. The meeting will focus on how technologies already in use can be combined with common-sense policies and 21st century modes of organization to create jobs, advance innovation, and enhance international cooperation. The meeting will take place at the National Academy of Sciences and will engage leaders from business, government, and academia in a discussion of the societal possibilities inherent in the in the creation of climate solutions. The event is timed to take place two weeks before the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, and coincides with the release of the Innovations journal special issue on energy & climate titled “Energy for Change.” Led by the Science Adviser to the President of the United States, John Holdren, and informed by a year-long project on energy & climate at the National Academy of Sciences, the meeting will be organized into a set of forward-looking conversations respectively emphasizing opportunities for business, for the United States, and for the global community of nations.

Featured speakers include:

  • John Holdren, Science Adviser to the President of the United States and perviously Director of the Belfer Center’s Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program
  • Thomas Schelling, 2005 recipient of the Nobel Prize in economics
  • Bill Drayton, Founder and CEO of Ashoka, Innovators for the Public
  • Richard Meserve, President of the Carnegie Institution
  • Iqbal Quadir, Founder and Director of MIT’s Legatum Center for Development and Entrepreneurship

New Washington, DC Organization

November 17th, 2009

Worth keeping an eye on:http://www.electrificationcoalition.org. They released their “Electrification Roadmap” yesterday. I do not have time to read it, but maybe you do.

HEK

Smart Grid and Broadband Over Powerline

November 12th, 2009

On November 9, 2009, the Brookings Institution held an event titled “Improving Broadband Innovation and Investment.”  A transcript as well as a video of the event may be found at http://www.brookings.edu/events/2009/1109_broadband_innovation.aspx.

The event is described on the Brookings website as follows:

Broadband and wireless technologies are key elements of our nation’s economic, social and civic development. With the Federal Communications Commission’s stated goals of bringing broadband access to all Americans, it is crucial to determine how to be innovative when investing in broadband infrastructure. How will infrastructure development be funded? What is the proper mix of financial resources? How can we identify emerging technologies that will serve citizens and businesses?

The Participants were:

Moderator

Darrell M. West, Vice President and Director, Governance Studies

Featured Panelists

John Horrigan, Consumer Research Director, Omnibus Broadband Initiative

Federal Communications Commission

Robert Shapiro, Senior Policy Fellow

Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy

Thomas Z. Freedman, President, Freedman Consulting

Author of A Kindle in Every Backpack: A Proposal for eTextbooks in American Schools

During the Q & A session I asked why broadband over powerline (BPL) had dropped off the map even though it is a byproduct of the smart grid (that everybody including some of the panelists say we need and it would provide competition in the broadband market. Only Mr. Horrigan of the FCC attempted to answer and he emphasized that he could only repeat what he had heard, since it is not within his area of study or expertise.  His answer was that he had heard it was a technical problem due to the current architecture of the electrical grid.

Let me emphasize that this is not meant to be an attack on Mr. Horrigan or anybody else on that particular panel.  The Smart Grid concept covers a lot of territory and it is quite difficult to pin it down.  People cannot be experts on every subject about which someone might question them.  But I am rather puzzled about why BPL has failed to gain traction in the US.

The electric power industry was instrumental in wrestling control of the telecommunications industry from Ma Bell in the 1960s by providing their own internal communications system to their workers using microwave towers on electric rights-of-way.  As I recall, they successfully argued before the regulators that electric service was essential and power utilities should not be at the mercy of the phone company to handle outages and power emergencies.

As best as I can understand, the smart grid will operate by broadband communications, likely using both wired and wireless technologies, to monitor the grid and provide smart metering to the home.  So is the current grid architecture a huge barrier to the building of smart grid technology?  Will the smart grid as envisioned not reach into homes and the meters not transmit information in real time through hard wiring or wireless?

Answers… answers… who has answers?

HEK